Alhambra Fields Institute Foundation · Granada

A private foundation, international from day one, with a central project:

The Human Being Map

An operating anthropological model, put to work on humanity’s most urgent challenges.

Explicit, open and verifiable: built with scientific evidence, rigorous thought, mathematics and AI.

Alhambra Fields Institute

Understanding the human being
to shape a better future

Our question, our focus

What, and who, is the human being?

Our challenges are human problems. Unfortunately, we have stopped studying the human being from a holistic perspective, and today nobody offers an integrated picture of what a human being is.

AFI exists to build one: explicit, open and verifiable. Grounded in knowledge, that is, science and rigorous thought, with the help of AI and mathematics. Universal: built with contributions from every discipline and culture, and shared by them. Rigorous, understandable and operational, for the agents of change and for society at large.

What

Homo natura

The human being as a biological reality, with observable and quantifiable characteristics.

Who

The self-conscious subject

A subject capable of personal identity, meaning and interiority, what some traditions have called soul or spirit.

Only through a much deeper understanding of the human being will we be able to realize what is truly happening, and identify realistic ways to overcome humanity’s increasingly urgent challenges.
Prof. Enrique Baca BaldomeroAFI Chief Scientific Director · Member of the European Academy of Sciences · Vice President of the Real Colegio Libre de Eméritos

Why AFI exists

Humanity’s great challenges are human problems

In each of them, what is missing is not resources or technology, but knowledge of how people actually feel, think and act.

Coexistence and governance

The mechanisms, motivations and interests that generate, intensify or ease polarization.

Responsible AI

How to bring its extraordinary potential into our lives without crossing the limits of what is human.

A humanistic economy

Economic and business models built on how people really are, not only on what they should be or do.

Education, seen whole

How memory, intelligence and critical thinking are formed, and how technology shapes them.

How we guide our lives

The drivers of behavior, and the obstacles to maturity, wellbeing and a meaningful life.

Interpersonal violence

Where aggressiveness, violence and destructiveness come from, in all their forms.

The planet’s sustainability

Why caring for the planet is not a priority in individual behavior, and what would make it one.

Organizations that change

How individual and collective interests can be reconciled so that collaboration becomes possible.

Suicide prevention

What leads a person to take their own life, one of the leading causes of death among the young.

If the obstacle to overcoming these challenges is ourselves, then we need to know much better how we are: our possibilities and limitations, how we perceive, what moves us, how we interact and react, and what we can expect of ourselves. It is a priority that cannot wait, above all now that AI threatens to outpace us.

These are not nine separate agendas. They are nine readings of the same question: what the human being actually is, and how that shapes what people do and can do.

The Human Being Map

A first model of the human being, made visible

The Anthropological Operating Map is AFI’s single project: every element with its record, its sources, its level of evidence and its data. What you see below is its visual representation, one part of it. The model is what stands behind the screen.

The Human Being Map, all-elements view
The Human Being Map, all-elements view. Working version. The records are provisional and are being reviewed, zone by zone, with Enrique Baca Baldomero and specialists.

Containing

8zones
1,238elements on three levels
4major research lines
33challenges for humanity
28declared gaps of first level
262verified databases
948,013datasets indexed

Built with the contributions of

5,000authors, from all times, disciplines and cultures
20,000selected documents

Clearly specifying

KnownWhat the evidence supports.
DebatedWhere genuine disagreement exists.
UnknownThe gaps the Map declares openly.
FalseWhat is unsupported or simply wrong.

What the starting model says

Each one of these statements can be discussed, corrected or refuted. That is the point of writing it down.

What it is, and who it is

A higher animal with two elements new in evolution: reflexive consciousness and articulated, symbolic language. From there, human beings can know and value themselves; they can love, create, dominate and destroy.

Never fully determined

Genome and environment interact throughout life. Neither genetic nor environmental determinism: the human being is never finished.

It develops in time

Capacities emerge in an order that can be described. Fear, aggressiveness or freedom mean different things depending on the moment of life in which they appear.

All behavior is motivated

Behind every act there is a need, a desire and a will; underneath, two fundamental motors: power and pleasure.

Imperfection is structural

The human being cannot fully know itself, is capable of self-deception, and lives between what it is and what it would like to be.

Facts and values, kept well distinguished

So that whoever does not share the model’s proposals can still use the rest of it.

How we work

Science & rigorous thought, mathematics and AI, together

Science and rigorous thought provide the meaning and the language, AI the scale, mathematics the proof. Not reducing people to numbers: representing what we know precisely enough to compare it, test it and improve it.

meaning

Science & rigorous thought

  • Conceptual clarity
  • Interpretation and human depth
  • Protection against reductionism
  • Ultimate validation
scale

Artificial intelligence

  • Large-scale extraction
  • Pattern discovery
  • Knowledge integration
  • Hypothesis generation
evidence

Mathematics

  • Formalization and measurement
  • Causal graphs and inference
  • Uncertainty and probability
  • Simulation and verification

“Kant held that a field contains only as much real science as it contains mathematics. Our hypotheses about the human being are still far from that. Combining mathematics with AI and rigorous thought, we now have an opportunity we have never had before.”

Luis SecoAFI Vice President · Chair, Centre for Sustainable Development, Fields Institute · Professor of Mathematics, University of Toronto

What AFI builds

An engine, the research that feeds it, and the transfer that puts it to work

A permanent scientific infrastructure, and a research program obliged to return standardized results to it. That obligation is what turns each project into a cumulative asset, not a report on a shelf.

The Human Knowledge Engine · five elements

1

The Anthropological Map, made visible

The live application, a 3D room and an extended-reality experience: how the Map is seen and walked into.

2

The Knowledge Database

Texts, datasets, expert judgment and measurement proxies, linked to the elements they explain.

3

Mathematical and AI models

Formal models that turn the Map’s variables into testable relations; AI that finds patterns at scale.

4

The Results Repository

The cumulative memory of validated outputs. Every project must leave structured results.

5

Sapientem LLM

A specialized AI assistant grounded in AFI’s curated knowledge, for researchers and, later, the public.

The research program · three levels, one portfolio

Level 1 · four years · permanent team

The four major research lines

The four questions at the head of the Map, led by Enrique Baca Baldomero and worked continuously, with a public state of the question every year.

Level 2 · two years each · 33 available

Challenge projects

A challenge of humanity reframed around the behaviors and motivations that produce it, with primary data and pathways for action.

Level 3 · one year each · 28 of first level

Declared-gap projects

One of the gaps the Map declares: what is known, debated, unknown and false, brought into focus.

The four major research lines

1 · DESCRIBEWhat is happening in the worldThe observable facts any conception of the human being has to explain.
2 · EXPLAINWhy it is happeningSeven families of causes, human mechanisms included.
3 · UNVEILWhich conceptions lie behindThe implicit anthropology of every policy, technology and organization.
4 · SHAREWhat all cultures could acceptA shareable minimum, without asking anyone to give up their tradition.

Knowledge transfer

The goal is not to inform more people, but to make human understanding usable by those who shape decisions: policy teams, companies, education systems, media, foundations and universities. Without forgetting society at large: understanding how people are will help everyone manage their own lives better.

A dedicated team turns each project into narratives, tools and pilots. What is adopted, rejected or cannot be used returns to the Engine as new questions and evidence of what works.

Insight→Narrative→Power→Execution↺feedback

Initial proof that it works

From knowledge to impact, already twice

Understand, formalize, apply, measure: the path the Engine and the research program are built to repeat on every challenge.

Preventing second suicide attempts

727,000deaths by suicide a year worldwide (WHO)
40 %of those who die by suicide had tried before
~50 %fewer new attempts in the SmartCrisis trials
  • KnowledgeThe Map reads suicide through the person, and shows where risk is already known: after a first attempt.
  • DiscoveryBehavior recorded passively by a smartphone predicts one-week risk.
  • ApplicationA prescribed app that activates the patient’s personal safety plan.
  • ImpactAbout half as many second attempts.

With Enrique Baca García’s psychiatric team and mathematicians of the Fields Institute.

Designing collaboration in a 50,000-employee IT company

20bridges built between the most critical departments
100+operating processes adjusted
200 %business growth compared with the industry
  • KnowledgeAt work people compete far more than they collaborate, and collaborate when both sides gain.
  • DiscoveryCollaboration cannot just be requested: it has to be designed around mutual benefit.
  • ApplicationA collaboration map: every area rates every other, and AI turns the answers into bridges and obstacles.
  • ImpactCollaboration built into the processes, in six and a half months.

Developed by members of the AFI promoting team.

In their words

Why the people behind AFI are here

Before technology completely outpaces humanity, the next revolution must be in our understanding of the human being.
Omar HatamlehAFI Vice President · former Chief Innovation & AI Officer, NASA Goddard
After the Genome and the Brain projects, the Human Being Map can be the next great initiative to understand who we are.
Leticia SoberónAFI Vice President · Psychologist and PhD in Connective Intelligence
AFI has to focus on researching and explaining what the human being is, not what it should be, or should do.
Rafael MiraAFI General Manager · former McKinsey & Company partner
We want to be the world’s reference center for research and knowledge transfer on the human being. And we can do it step by step: every single effort will have an impact of its own and will contribute to the whole.
Eduardo Díez-HochleitnerAFI President · social impact, executive management and investment

People

A board that already spans four continents

AFI’s governing bodies are being constituted.

Board of Trustees

Eduardo Díez-HochleitnerPresidentSocial impact, executive management and investment · Spain
Leticia SoberónVice PresidentPsychology, collaborative intelligence · Mexico
Omar HatamlehVice PresidentArtificial intelligence, NASA · USA, Jordan
Luis SecoVice PresidentChair, Centre for Sustainable Development, Fields Institute · Professor of Mathematics, University of Toronto
Enrique Baca GarcíaTrusteePsychiatry, UAM · Spain
Kumar MurtyTrusteeMathematics · India, Canada
Rolando BalsindeTrusteeStrategy · USA, Asia, Arab world
David Jiménez-BlancoTrusteeStrategy and finance · Spain
Fernando SavaterTrusteePhilosophy · Spain
Álvaro Pascual-LeoneTrusteeNeuroscience, Harvard · USA
Xavier SoberónTrusteeGenetics, UNAM · Mexico
Francisco HerreraTrusteeAI and computer science, UGR · Spain
Goyo PanaderoTrusteeCommunications
María GarcíaTrusteeGovernance of organizations · USA, Peru
Pilar GarcíaTrusteeFoundations, AEF · Spain
Gregorio JiménezTrusteeGranada ecosystem

Management

General Manager

Rafael Mira

Economist and Kellogg MBA. Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, McKinsey & Company (partner) and Banco Santander, then a decade founding ventures in knowledge and collaborative intelligence. Co-author of the starting model.

Chief Scientific Director

Prof. Enrique Baca Baldomero

Psychiatrist, former Full Professor of Psychiatry at the Autonomous University of Madrid, Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Vice President of the Real Colegio Libre de Eméritos. The key author of the starting anthropological model; chairs AFI’s Scientific and Ethical Committee.

Treasurer

David Pérez Renovales

Senior finance executive in telecommunications, insurance and banking: finance director at MásMóvil, with earlier roles at Línea Directa Aseguradora and Bankinter. Independent non-executive director of Allfunds Group and lecturer at Universidad Pontificia Comillas.

Director of Alliances and Institutional Relations

Antonio Fontanini

PhD in Science from the University of Pisa and alumnus of Harvard, Stanford, Chicago and IE. CEO and founder of Erasmus Equitis, investor and board member with experience in innovation, technology, venture capital and social impact.

General Secretary

Begoña Álvarez

Lawyer. Former Minister of Justice and Public Administration of the Regional Government of Andalusia and member of its highest advisory body, the Consejo Consultivo de Andalucía. Earlier, head of International Relations at Spain’s General Council of the Judiciary.

Scientific partners

Science, thought and mathematics, from the first day

Real Colegio Libre de Eméritos
Thought

Instituto de Estudios Avanzados del Real Colegio Libre de Eméritos

A private cultural foundation created in 1988 to preserve and activate the work of leading academics and public thinkers: more than a hundred professors and experts across philosophy, history, sociology, medicine, genetics, economics, law and literature.

Fields Institute
Mathematics and AI

Fields Institute, Toronto

The Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, at the University of Toronto, is one of the leading international centers for mathematical research. It carries the name of John Charles Fields, whose legacy is the Fields Medal.

With leading mathematicians and AI experts from the University of Toronto and the University of Granada.

Global from inception

Year 1Granada and TorontoGranada anchors the Alhambra narrative; Toronto anchors the Fields alliance.
NextChina and MexicoWhere alliances and experts are already in place.
ThenIndia, the United States, the Arab world, the United Kingdom and GermanyAlways with exceptional experts who see the human being whole.

Support AFI

Be an active part of a project crucial for humanity

AFI is financed by philanthropy and, increasingly, by its own income: training, applied projects and licensing. Every contribution is connected to the rest through the Engine.

  • Help us reach the fundersThe international roadshow that presents AFI to the world’s major foundations.
  • Fund a PathfinderThe first stage of any block of the program, decided on results.
  • Fund an element or a projectAn element of the Engine, a research line, a challenge or a declared gap.
  • Name a spaceA named place in AFI’s sites.
  • Become an anchor funderA multi-year commitment to the whole program.

Start small, grow on results

A Pathfinder

Every block of the program can start as a Pathfinder: a first stage with its own deliverable and a decision written in advance.

  • 3 to 12 months
  • A state of the question, a diagnosis or a prototype
  • Moving to the full project is approved on that result
  • The funder gets the first right to fund what it designs

Contribute knowledge

Help us improve the model

The Map is meant to be discussed, corrected and refuted. If your research, your discipline or your culture can strengthen it, or show where it is wrong, we want to hear from you: researchers, clinicians, thinkers and experts from every field and every tradition.

How we want to be judged

What would make us say this has failed

Declaring the failure criteria in advance is the cheapest way an institution can be believed. These are the five the promoters have agreed to be judged on.

The Map grows, nothing is measured

More elements, but no more variables with proxies and evidence levels: a better diagram, not a scientific instrument.

The projects do not feed the Engine

If projects end in reports rather than standardized outputs, this was a series of grants after all.

Nobody outside uses anything

If no government, school system or company adopts a framework and keeps using it, transfer failed.

The model becomes unfalsifiable

If our answers stop being the kind of thing evidence could contradict, AFI has become a school of thought.

Only the West is in the room

A conception acceptable to every culture has to be argued with from inside each tradition, not read from outside.

And one that is not a failure. If the model is shown to be wrong in an important part, by evidence the institute itself produced, that is the program working. In Year 1 an external panel will try to refute the Map, and its verdict will be published.

Contact

Not just another interesting project. Do you want to be part of it?

Write to us to receive AFI’s foundational documents, or to arrange a conversation.

contact@alhambrafieldsinstitute.org